Lewis-McChord soldiers in Afghanistan see new threats, uncertainties
With
Afghans turning against U.S. forces and the Taliban still fighting hard
for a key area, concerns are growing about what will happen after
American combat troops withdraw.
BY Hal Bernton / The Seattle Times OCT. 14, 2012
Joint
Base Lewis-McChord soldiers are stationed at Checkpoint Perozi, in
Afghanistan's Panjwai District. A watch point looks out over a field
where a soldier died in the spring during a firefight, and a village
where a lieutenant lost a foot in the summer.
CHECKPOINT PEROZI,
Afghanistan — U.S. soldiers who rotate through this checkpoint in
Panjwai District sleep on cots that line the narrow confines of a
thick-mud-walled hut where farmers once used to dry grapes. To guard
against attack from insurgents, they take turns posting watch on a
rooftop that overlooks a village in this traditional homeland of the
Taliban.
Their
view takes in a nearby field where a young soldier died in a spring
ambush just weeks after their unit — the 1st Battalion 23rd
Infantry Regiment — arrived from Western Washington's Joint Base
Lewis-McChord.
The
village skyline is dominated by a fortresslike compound where a
lieutenant stepped on an improvised explosive device that blew off his
foot.
In
recent weeks, U.S. Army commanders have decided to beef up security
here in response to another potential threat: Afghan police who occupy
the housing in an adjacent courtyard and join U.S. forces on patrols
into the village.
"The
generals want everyone here to watch those guys," said Pfc. Matthew
Brown, a young soldier in Blackhawk Company. "We not only have to guard
outside the wire, but now we have to look after our back door as well."
This
tighter scrutiny of Afghan forces reflects Pentagon concerns over the
growing threat of Afghan allies turning against U.S. forces. These
insider killings have killed more than 50 western troops this year,
including a September assault at a checkpoint north of here that
claimed the lives of three Lewis-McChord soldiers.
The restrictions are a troubling new aspect of the war.
There
is increased uncertainty about who is friend and who is foe, and what
will happen to security gains once the NATO troops cede combat duties
to Afghan forces in late 2014.
The strategy
for winding down the war faces one of its toughest tests here in
Panjwai, an area of strategic importance to the Taliban, who use the
cover of trees and foliage to move arms, explosives and fighters to
other areas of southern Afghanistan.
"In
their minds, if they can't hold Panjwai ... they can't hold anywhere,"
said U.S. Gen. Robert Abrams, who leads NATO's regional southern
command. "That's why we have to fight so hard for it."
1st
Battalion leaders say they have been able to pressure the Taliban by
arresting some of the ringleaders of bomb-making networks and cracking
down on insurgent supply lines.
To try
to protect such gains after 2014, the Pentagon plans for an "enduring
presence" of U.S. advisers, Special Forces, air support and other
assets, the cost of which has yet to be estimated.
But in
Panjwai, even with the current level of forces and spending, hostile
places remain, including the village just outside of Checkpoint Perozi.
"We
clear something and pull back out, and then they (insurgents) reinhabit
it," said Pfc. Chris Engelke, a soldier from California who took his
turn on rooftop watch.
"We
never keep things clear ... I guarantee you that if we were to walk
down that road we would get shot at or find an IED."
An
Afghan National Army captain in Panjwai is skeptical that his force
will be able to withstand the Taliban after U.S. combat troops withdraw.
"Right
now we have helicopters. We have (surveillance) balloons and
everything, and you see still what is going on," said Capt. Habibullah
Noorzi. "If America is not here, there is going to be killing and
destruction. Not only in Panjwai, but other districts and Kandahar
City. The Taliban will be coming."
Always on guard
Within Panjwai District, there hasn't been an incident of Afghan forces attacking NATO troops.
But U.S. forces are constantly on guard.
When
an unarmed Afghan soldier ventures from his side of a combat outpost to
visit a medic on the American side, he is flanked on both sides by
armed U.S. solders, an escort worthy of a prisoner.
Even Afghan officers can't escape an armed escort as they head into talks with their U.S. counterparts.
Such
security measures, though awkward, have not unraveled the partnerships
that some U.S. soldiers here have forged with Afghan National Army
forces.
On a
recent patrol, Afghan soldiers appeared poised and professional as they
carefully navigated a path through a route notorious for IEDs.
But
the Afghan soldiers were far outnumbered by U.S. troops, who used
mine-sweeping equipment to find a safe route. This patrol was backed up
by U.S. air power — two Kiowa helicopters called in to fire
hundreds of rounds of 50-caliber bullets and eight rockets at
insurgents trying to stage an ambush.
That
overnight mission was abruptly cut short as word came down from NATO
commanders about a temporary halt of joint operations to reassess
security.
After
a noon lunch break, the U.S. soldiers apologized as they shook hands
with their Afghan counterparts, and bid them farewell.
"You guys are not the problem," said Staff Sgt. Kelly Rogne, a Lewis-McChord soldier from Colville, Stevens County.
"We
are great friends. We work well together. You are friends. Don't think
that we're going to shoot you," said an Afghan sergeant.
Among
U.S. soldiers in Panjwai, there appears to be more mistrust of another
important element of the Afghan forces: the Afghan National Civil Order
Police.
At
Checkpoint Perozi, U.S. forces had hoped the police would take over
staffing, and free up American soldiers for other missions. But the
Afghans have balked at staying alone at the checkpoint.
As
U.S. soldiers rousted themselves after another night in the Perozi
grape hut, the scent of marijuana came wafting through the air from the
Afghan side of the compound, where the police were smoking in a
frequent morning ritual.
U.S.
soldiers say that the police don't show much interest in patrols, and
earlier in the year an interpreter was killed by an IED set off by a an
Afghan policeman who wandered off a cleared path.
"They
really don't do very much. If anything, they are a hassle," said Pfc.
Brown. "To be honest, I would rather just go out without them."
Hal Bernton: 206-464-2581 or hbernton@seattletimes.com