SPRING,
Texas--In front of her gated apartment complex, Courtney Payne, a 9-year-old
fourth grader with dark hair pulled tightly into a ponytail, exits a yellow
school bus.
Moments later, her movement is observed by
Alan Bragg, the local police chief, standing in a windowless control room more
than a mile away.
Chief Bragg is not using video surveillance.
Rather, he watches an icon on a computer screen. The icon marks the spot on a
map where Courtney got off the bus, and, on a larger level, it represents the
latest in the convergence of technology and student security.
Hoping to
prevent the loss of a child through kidnapping or more innocent circumstances,
a few schools have begun monitoring student arrivals and departures using
technology similar to that used to track livestock and pallets of retail
shipments.
Here in a growing middle- and working-class
suburb just north of Houston, the effort is undergoing its most ambitious test.
The Spring Independent School District is equipping 28,000 students with ID
badges containing computer chips that are read when the students get on and off
school buses. The information is fed automatically by wireless phone to the
police and school administrators.
In a variation on the concept, a Phoenix
school district in November is starting a project using fingerprint technology
to track when and where students get on and off buses. Last year, a charter
school in Buffalo began automating attendance counts with computerized ID
badges--one of the earliest examples of what educators said could become a
widespread trend.
At the Spring district, where no student has
ever been kidnapped, the system is expected to be used for more pedestrian
purposes, Chief Bragg said: to reassure frantic parents, for example, calling
because their child, rather than coming home as expected, went to a friend's
house, an extracurricular activity or a Girl Scout meeting.
When the district unanimously approved the
$180,000 system, neither teachers nor parents objected, said the president of
the board. Rather, parents appear to be applauding. "I'm sure we're being
overprotective, but you hear about all this violence," said Elisa
Temple-Harvey, 34, the parent of a fourth grader. "I'm not saying this
will curtail it, or stop it, but at least I know she made it to campus."
The project also is in keeping with the
high-tech leanings of the district, which built its own high-speed data network
and is outfitting the schools with wireless Internet access. A handful of
companies have adapted the technology for use in schools.
But there are critics, including some older
students and privacy groups like the American Civil Liberties Union, who argue
that the system is security paranoia.
The decades-old technology, called radio
frequency identification, or RFID, is growing less expensive and developing
vast new capabilities. It is based on a computer chip that has a unique number
programmed into it and contains a tiny antenna that sends information to a
reader.
The same
technology is being used by companies like Wal-Mart to track pallets of retail
items. Pet owners can have chips embedded in cats and dogs to identify them if
they are lost.
In October, the Food and Drug Administration
approved use of an RFID chip that could be implanted under a patient's skin and
would carry a number that linked to the patient's medical records.
At the Spring district, the first recipients
of the computerized ID badges have been the 626 students of Bammel Elementary
school. That includes Felipe Mathews, a 5-year-old kindergartner, and the other
30 students who rode bus No. 38 to school on a recent morning.
Felipe, wearing a gray, hooded sweatshirt
with a Spiderman logo and blue high-top tennis shoes also with a Spiderman
logo, wore his yellow ID badge on a string around his neck. When he climbed on
to the bus, he pressed the badge against a flat gray "reader" just
inside the bus door. The reader ID beeped.
Shortly after, he was followed onto the bus
by Christopher Nunez, a 9-year-old fourth grader. Christopher said it was
important that students wore badges so they did not get lost. Asked what might
cause someone to get lost, he said, "If they're in second grade they might
not know which street is their home."
But on the morning Felipe and Christopher
shared a seat on bus No. 38, the district experienced one of the early
technology hiccups. When the bus arrived at school, the system had not worked.
On the Web site that includes the log of student movements, there was no record
that any of the students on the bus had arrived.
It was just one of many headaches; the system
had also made double entries for some students, and got arrival times and
addresses wrong for others. "It's early glitches," said Brian
Weisinger, the head of transportation for the Spring district, adding that he
expected to work out the problems.
But for the Enterprise Charter School in
Buffalo, where administrators gave ID cards with the RFID technology to around
460 students last year, the computer problems lasted for many months.
The system is set up so that when students walk
in the door each morning, they pass by one of two kiosks which together cost
$40,000--designed to pick up their individual radio frequency numbers as a way
of taking attendance. Initially, though, the kiosks failed to register some
students, or registered ones who were not there.
Mark Walter, head of technology for the
Buffalo school, said the system was working well now. But Walter cautions that
the more ambitious technological efforts in Spring, particularly given the
reliance on cell phones to call in the data, are "going to run in to some
problems."
In the long run, however, the biggest problem
may be human error. Parents, teachers and administrators said their primary
worry is getting students to remember their cards, given they often forget such
basics as backpacks, lunch money and gym shoes. And then there might be
mischief: Students could trade their cards.
Still, administrators in Buffalo said they
had been contacted by districts around the country, and from numerous other
countries, interested in using something similar.
And the administrators in Buffalo and here in
Spring said the technology, when perfected, would eventually be a big help.
Parents at the Spring district seem to feel the same way. They speak of
momentary horrors of realizing their child did not arrive home when expected.
Some older students are not so enthusiastic.
"It's too Big Brother for me," said
Kenneth Haines, a 15-year-old ninth grader who is on the football and debate
teams. "Something about the school wanting to know the exact place and
time makes me feel kind of like an animal."
Middle and high school students already wear
ID badges, but they have not yet been equipped with the RFID technology. Even
so, some bus drivers are apparently taking advantage of the technology's
mythical powers by telling students that they are being tracked on the bus in
order to get them to behave better.
Kenneth's opinion is echoed by organizations
like the ACLU and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit group that
promotes "digital rights."
It is "naive to believe all this data
will only be used to track children in the extremely unlikely event of the rare
kidnapping by a stranger," said Barry Steinhardt, director of the
technology and liberty program at the ACLU.
Steinhardt said schools, once they had
invested in the technology, could feel compelled to get a greater return on
investment by putting it to other uses, like tracking where students go after
school.
Advocates of the technology said they did not
plan to go that far. But, they said, they do see broader possibilities, such as
implanting RFID tags under the skin of children to avoid problems with lost or
forgotten tags. More immediately, they said, they could see using the
technology to track whether students attend individual classes.
Weisinger, the head of transportation at
Spring, said that, for now, the district could not afford not to put the
technology to use. Chief Bragg said the key to catching kidnappers was getting
crucial information within two to four hours of a crime--information such as
the last place the child was seen.
It's one of the cutest of those cute IBM Corp. TV commercials, the ones
that feature the ever-present help desk. This time, the desk appears smack in
the middle of a highway, blocking the path of a big rig.
"Why are you blocking the road?" the driver asks. "Because you're
going the wrong way," replies the cheerful Help Desk lady. "Your cargo
told me so." It seems the cartons inside the truck contained IBM
technology that alerted the company when the driver made a wrong turn.
It's clever, all right -- and creepy. Because the technology needn't be
applied only to cases of beer. The trackers could be attached to every can of
beer in the case, and allow marketers to track the boozing habits of the
purchasers. Or if the cargo is clothing, those little trackers could have been
stitched inside every last sweater. Then some high-tech busybody could keep
those wearing them under surveillance.
If this sounds paranoid, take it up with IBM. The company filed a patent
application in 2001 which contemplates using this wireless snooping technology
to track people as they roam through "shopping malls, airports, train
stations, bus stations, elevators, trains, airplanes, rest rooms, sports
arenas, libraries, theaters, museums, etc." An IBM spokeswoman insisted
the company isn't really prepared to go this far. Patent applications are
routinely written to include every possible use of a technology, even some the
company doesn't intend to pursue. Still, it's clear somebody at IBM has a
pretty creepy imagination.
And it's not just IBM. A host of other companies are looking at ways to
embed surveillance chips into practically everything we purchase -- and even
into our bodies. It's a prospect that infuriates Harvard graduate student
Katherine Albrecht.
"I think the shocking part is they've spent the past three years
saying, oh no, we'd never do this," Albrecht said. But instead of taking
their word for it, Albrecht and her colleague, former bank examiner Liz
McIntyre, began reading everything they could find on the subject. Now they're
serving up the scary results of their research in a scathing new book, "Spychips."
That's Albrecht's preferred name for a technology called radio frequency
identification technology, or RFID. If you use a Mobil Speedpass to pay for
gasoline, you're already using RFID. Your Speedpass contains a microchip and a
small antenna that allows it to broadcast information to a receiver. The chip
has no power source of its own. Instead, it picks up radio signals from an RFID
chip reader, turns these radio waves into electricity, and uses the power to
broadcast data to the reader.
Because they need no batteries, RFID chips can be made small enough to
attach invisibly to practically anything. One company is even working on a way
to print RFID chips onto newspapers, using electrically conductive ink.
Why is this so scary? Because so many of us pay for our purchases with
credit or debit cards, which contain our names, addresses, and other sensitive
information. Now imagine a store with RFID chips embedded in every product. At
checkout time, the digital code in each item is associated with our credit card
data. From now on, that particular pair of shoes or carton of cigarettes is
associated with you. Even if you throw them away, the RFID chips will survive.
Indeed, Albrecht and McIntyre learned that the phone company BellSouth Corp.
had applied for a patent on a system for scanning RFID tags in trash, and using
the data to study the shopping patterns of individual consumers.
"Spychips" reveals a US government plan to order RFID chips
embedded in all cars sold in America. No big deal -- until you realize the
police could then track your comings and goings by putting inexpensive RFID
readers at key intersections.
Then there are the RFID pajamas from a California maker of children's
clothing. It's a clever way to prevent kidnapping: Just put RFID readers in
your home, to alert you if Junior's taking an unauthorized trip. It's easy to
imagine parents buying into this idea, but they'll now have to install RFID
readers in their homes. ''There's the nose in the camel's tent," said
Albrecht. At first, companies will just scan your kids' jammies. But later
they'll ask permission to scan the tags on your groceries and your clothes. The
consulting company Accenture has patented a design that builds an RFID reader
into a household medicine cabinet, to make sure you're taking all your
medications.
There are countless applications for RFID, and viewed in isolation, some
are downright appealing. It would be nice for the medicine cabinet to send you
an e-mail -- "Time to buy more Viagra." But what if it's also sending
that data to consumer marketing companies, eager to bombard you with unwanted
advertising? Worse yet, what if they're sending the data to government
investigators, or to hackers who've figured out how to break into the system?
Not to worry, said Jack Grasso, spokesman for EPC Global of
Lawrenceville, N.J.,, the nonprofit organization that sets technical standards
for RFID systems. His organization has a code of ethics that requires notifying
consumers about the presence of RFID tags. The group also recognizes the right
of consumers to deactivate RFID tags, and is working to develop systems to make
this easy.
So how about putting these principles into law? No thanks, said
Grasso. "We believe it is far too early." Because the RFID industry is
so young,
any regulation "would have a chilling effect that would put us back
years."
And that's a bad thing?
Somebody needs to sit down and think this through. Dozens of companies
and government agencies are planning to use RFID to track nearly every move we
make. And although many of the individual applications make sense, what would
happen if they were all implemented, without oversight or restraint? We'd then
live in a world in which everything we own gossips about us behind our backs.
And it would be too late to call the IBM Help Desk to ask for our
privacy back.
Hiawatha Bray can be reached at bray@globe.com.