CEO’s compensation $29M, including $14M bonuses
after
white-collar workers bonuses lowered

March 13, 2015
By Dominic Gates

Seattle Times aerospace reporter

  Boeing Chief Executive Jim McNerney’s total compensation last year jumped to nearly $29 million, up 24 percent from 2013, according to a regulatory filing Friday.
 
Though most Boeing employees got a smaller bonus this year than last, McNerney’s total included an annual bonus of $4.4 million, the same amount that he received in 2013.
  His compensation also included a $10 million three-year performance bonus, double the target amount.
  Boeing’s second highest paid executive, Commercial Airplanes boss Ray Conner, received $16
million. Conner got an annual bonus of $1.3 million and his three-year performance bonus was almost $800,000, the filing shows.
  Conner’s 2014 bonus was down 9 percent from the previous year’s.
  However, the filing also shows Conner was given a supplemental grant of 50,000 shares that will vest in three years “to acknowledge his many significant contributions to our Commercial Airplanes business and to encourage him to forgo an opportunity to retire in the near future.”


  Dennis Muilenburg, Boeing’s chief operating officer and the likely successor to McNerney, received almost $12 million.
  His annual bonus was $1.6million, down 7 percent from the previous year, and his three-year performance bonus was $2.6 million.
  The filing listing the executives’ compensation comes just weeks after both white- collar staff and production workers at Boeing received lower annual bonuses than last year.
  Despite Boeing’s $5.4
billion net profit in 2014, the rank-and-file employees’ bonuses were down from the previous year because they failed to “far exceed” financial-performance targets set at the beginning of the year. Though the company exceeded those preset targets by 30 percent, that was not enough to trigger the maximum bonuses, equal to twice the target bonuses.
  Unlike those workers, McNerney was granted the maximum bonus allowed under his annual compensation plan.
  In addition, in the separate three-year performance bonus plan for executives, the filing states that Boeing’s 2012-2014 “cumulative economic profit” was $8.332
billion versus a target of $5.701 billion, resulting in a maximum award of twice the target amount for McNerney and other executives.
  Last month, salaried non-management staff, including engineers, in Washington state received annual bonuses averaging just over $4,500.
  That was approximately 12.5 days of extra pay, down from 16.5 days of extra pay the previous year, or a 24 percent drop.
  Also last month, members of the Machinists union in a separate annual bonus plan received an average payout of $2,294.
 
This was 3.1 percent of their total 2014 gross wages, short of the maximum 4 percent bonus the Machinists received the previous year, or a 23 percent drop.
  This month, Boeing’s managers will get the payout from a new annual bonus plan that will pay out bonuses ranging from 12.5 percent of salary for first-level managers to 22.5 percent of salary for third-level managers.
    These high percentages were in part designed to compensate for the fact that in 2014 Boeing changed the pay structure so that managers no longer get paid for overtime.
  The executives’ reported compensation totals for 2014 include stock grants that cannot be turned into cash for several years, as well as increases in the value of the pensions they’ll receive upon retirement.
  Actual compensation realized during last year — equivalent to “take-home” cash — omits those future amounts. It replaces those figures with stock vested in 2014 from grants in previous years, as well as stock options exercised during the year.
  In these terms, Conner’s “take-home” cash is greatly reduced by the $8.5 million he received in stock that hasn’t yet vested and comes to just under $6 million.
  McNerney’s “take-home” cash for the year, bolstered by the $14.5 million in bonuses that were paid immediately, is listed in the filing as $23.3 million.

Dominic Gates: 206-464-2963 or dgates@seattletimes.com

  For the long term blood-letting (destruction) of a company nothing works better than giving “Management” stock; this is the gift that keeps on destroying. Say the “Company” gives the CEO, COO and CFO a combined offering of 100,000 shares (not unheard of) and the “Company” has a quarterly dividend of $1.52 that gives these three individuals $152,000 to split every 3 months or $608,000 a year that is not being used to fund everyone else’s pension or health care or shore up the “Company”. If these three individuals receive 100,000 shares year after year for 5 or 10 years you have a very serious financial drain on the “Company” $1,824,000 by the second year, $9,120,000 paid by the end of year 5 and a whopping total of $33,440,000 paid out after 10 years. This blood-letting will continue year after year until the “Company” goes bankrupt.

Year

Shares - Total

Dividend Paid Yearly

Total Paid Out
Year 1 to 10

1

100,000

$  608,000

$   608,000

2

200,000

$1,216,000

$ 1,824,000

3

300,000

$1,824,000

$ 3,648,000

4

400,000

$2,432,000

$ 6,080,000

5

500,000

$3,040,000

$ 9,120,000

6

500,000

$3,648,000

$12,768,000

7

700,000

$4,256,000

$17,024,000

8

800,000

$4,864,000

$21,888,000

9

900,000

$5,472,000

$27,360,000

10

1,000,000

$6,080,000

$33,440,000

  If those 3 individuals stay 10 years and than leave, they or those who inherit their shares will split $6,080,000 yearly forever. Now bring 3 new people in and repeat; that is why the company worker will never get ahead, those working at the company will pay forever or until the company is bankrupt.
  For the “Working Class” this was not taught in your “Economics” class, but that is how the worker becomes a liability to the “Elite”. When the “Company” can no longer afford to feed the “Elite” their dividend check; “Management” has to find a way to maximize profits, one simple method is to off shore jobs. Foreign workers cost less, have little job protection, little to no pension liability and little to no medical coverage so they are not the “actuarial” problem to the dividend check that an American worker is/was and until the American worker is reduced to a third world country employee they will continue to be an accounting problem.